The New York Times The New York Times New York Region September 5, 2002  

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
- Metro Campaigns
- The City
- Columns
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia/Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version

Join Ameritrade. Get 25 commission-free trades.


Find More Low Fares! Experience Orbitz!


$7 Online Market Orders, 162 offices


Small Business Center: OPEN NetworkSM tools


Go to Advanced Search/ArchiveGo to Advanced Search/ArchiveSymbol Lookup
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, mcaserta

State to Close Queens Plant That Is Biggest Polluter in City

By RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA

ALBANY, Sept. 4 — Settling a dispute with environmental and community groups, New York State has agreed to shut down a power plant in Astoria, Queens, that is the largest source, by far, of toxic pollution in New York City.

The State Power Authority is to announce Thursday that it will close the facility, the Charles Poletti plant, at some point between 2008 and 2010, and that until then it will steeply cut emissions by changing the plant's mix of fuels.

The Power Authority wants to build a 500-megawatt plant next to the existing 825-megawatt Poletti plant, near the East River. Environmentalists usually favor building new plants because they are far cleaner than older ones, but they have been fighting for two years to block this project, using their resistance as leverage to persuade the authority to eliminate Poletti.

Two recent court decisions gave environmental groups powerful new ammunition, and they threatened to sue to block the new plant when it seemed likely earlier this year that a state board would approve it.

Gov. George E. Pataki stepped in, according to people involved in the case, and directed the Power Authority to settle the dispute. The resulting agreement, which is legally binding on the authority, provides for closing Poletti and clears the way for approval of the new plant next door.

"To me, it was very simple that we had to get this thing done, and not simply because we wanted to have a new plant online, but because we wanted to end the pollution from the Poletti plant," the governor said today in an interview. "The new plants are so infinitely cleaner that those who just blanket oppose any new construction do the state and its environment a disservice."

The deal saves the governor, who is in the middle of a re-election campaign, from the prospect of a high-profile lawsuit and accusations that his administration is on the unpopular side of an environmental issue.

An Environmental Protection Agency report released in August named Poletti as far and away the largest source of toxic air, ground or water emissions in New York City, at more than 250,000 pounds per year — more than all reported sources in Brooklyn, Manhattan and the Bronx, combined.

"This community has been pleading for years to shut the thing down, and the E.P.A. report added fuel to that," said Assemblyman Michael N. Gianaris, who represents the neighborhood. "It's the one plant in the city the governor really has control over, and I'm obviously thrilled he did the right thing."

Lisa Garcia, a lawyer for the New York Public Interest Research Group and one of the people who negotiated the agreement, said Poletti frequently violated the terms of its environmental permits. "We made it very clear that we were ready to go to the court and say, `They can't build a new plant until they do some environmental mitigation, and the best mitigation is to close Poletti,' " she said.

Poletti can burn either natural gas or oil, and in recent years it has used oil more than 60 percent of the time; oil creates much more pollution than gas. Under the agreement, starting in January, it will burn oil no more than 25 percent of the time from May through September, and no more than 40 percent the rest of the year.

The new 500-megawatt plant will use oil even less often, and will have up-to-date emission controls that Poletti lacks. When that plant is running and Poletti is closed, the net effect, environmental groups say, will be a 95 percent reduction in both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.





Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles:




E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints

Wake up to the world with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper.
Click Here for 50% off.


Home | Back to New York Region | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


Copyright The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints

Advertisement


Topics

 Alerts
Environmental Protection Agency
Queens (NYC)
Gas (Fuel)
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters






NYT Guide to New York City 2002

Price: $16.95 Learn more.







You can now track properties that interest you, with our Real Estate Tracker. Click here to sign up for the e-mail and start receiving information on the latest properties on the market.








Search by Zip Code:

Sign up for E-Mail Alerts
Luxury & Vacation Homes
Hamptons
Florida
California
More...

Mortgage & Moving Services